[PLUG-TALK] Re: [PLUG] Sounds good to me ;)

J Henshaw jeff at jhenshaw.com
Tue Jun 18 14:43:36 UTC 2002


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeme A Brelin" <jeme at brelin.net>
To: "PLUG off-topic discussion" <plug-talk at lists.pdxlinux.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [PLUG-TALK] Re: [PLUG] Sounds good to me ;)


>
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, J Henshaw wrote:
> > > I think the point we're all trying to make is that there is no "ours".
> > > There is yours and that might even be mine, to some extent (though we
> > > belong to distinct and rapidly diverging sub-cultures).
> >
> > Here is an example of muddle-head.
>
> The following or the preceding?
>
> > Read this statement and tell me it is not sefl-contradictory and a
> > paradox.
>
> I don't see a self-contradiction or a paradox.

There is yours and that might even be mine

>
> There is no mutually exclusive reality here.  If you have a particular
> qualm, bring it up and we will all attempt to explain to you where you
> misunderstood.

There is yours and that might even be mine

>
> However, you appear to choose only to take your first-blush
> (mis)understanding as the True Meaning and make no attempt to seek
> clarification.

There is yours and that might even be mine
>
> Your presumptuousness is cotton in your ears.
>
> J.
> --

Your ignorance is boundless

Look up the word yours and mine.  They mean two different things.

That's why it requires two different words to communicate the two mutually
exclusive precepts.

What part of reality do you not understand?

jH







More information about the PLUG-talk mailing list