[PLUG-TALK] Re: [PLUG] Sounds good to me ;)

J Henshaw jeff at jhenshaw.com
Wed Jun 19 10:52:06 UTC 2002


----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Davis" <mindglow at dsl-only.net>
To: <plug-talk at lists.pdxlinux.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [PLUG-TALK] Re: [PLUG] Sounds good to me ;)


> On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 16:23, J Henshaw wrote:
>
> >
> > Oh really?
> > I just told you many personal anecdotes that are enough to make you
wonder.
> Jeff,
>
> If you are skilled in your analytical abilities as you claim to be your
> should know that anecdotal evidence cannot be extended to show that
> those things are indicitive of the whole group. Do you really expect us
> to believe that because you know of 2 cases where illegal immigrants
> were rapists that all people that immigrate to thins country illegally
> are rapists? Come on now. Your certainly setting up a straw man though.
> Your argument goes like this:
>
> 1) I know of 2 cases where illegal immigrants raped someone.
> 2) Illegal immigrants are rapists
> 3) You support people being able to immigrate to this country.
> 4) You support rape
>
> Do you even see the serious jumps in logic that one must make to argue
> like this? Perhaps you need some work on your 99th percentile reading
> and comprehension skills.
>

But Doug,  I am dealing with Jeme Brelin here.
That should suffice as an explanation.
I am trying to see where he draws the line,  and when he wiggles it.
I know you are correct.


> To me you are just an arrogant egotistical blowhard that does not
> analyze the so called facts that he has read.

You care to substantiate?
Take any one item I call fact and sock it to me, please.
Let's start with 2+2=4 which Jeme cannot even agree on.
He cannot agree on the Websters definitions either.
This is where the whole fabric falls apart.
His computer won't care about wiggle room because it is LOGICAL.
So I use it as an analogy to prove my position.
He is silent on protocols and how they must be agreed upon and must be in
one common languge to get any work done.
I hope you see the connection and it's importance before continuing.


>When someone doesn't agree
> with your flawed analysis, than we are too slow or stupid to get it. I'm
> thinking that maybe these characteristics apply to you. If you don't
> agree with their logic, the point is irrelevant in your mind. (but not
> to anyone else) You criticize others spelling and grammar mistakes but
> your writing abounds with them. Maybe its you that needs to open your
> mind?
>
> Doug

You are entitled to your opinion Doug.






More information about the PLUG-talk mailing list