[PLUG-TALK] Fair Use, etc.
J.A. Henshaw
jeff at jhenshaw.com
Thu Mar 28 22:03:45 UTC 2002
Russ Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 12:55, J.A. Henshaw wrote:
>
>>I am pointing out that you do not own the land under the
>>home today, when you "buy" a home.
>>
>
> Why do you say that? When I have in my possession a deed to a property
> described in the county records, do I not own the property described?
>
You have exclusive right to use the land, as long as you:
pay your taxes (rent)
follow the building codes ( setbacks, fencelines, etc)
the health codes (septic, water etc)
the penal codes ( grow marijuana, etc)
Build a shed with a concrete slab underneath? Got your
permission from the city?
What else do you "own" that you need permission to do things
with?
However, the above is food for thought, and not meant to
be proof.
I sense that you are genuinely interested in this and not
merely being rhetorical, so if you want the entire
enchilada I will be more than happy to give you the history
and the proof.
> If I have an undeveloped property deeded to me, do I own nothing?
>
You have exclusive use pending conditions set forth by the
owner of the land, the city or county in which your deed is
recorded in.
>
>>Oh really? Again, I think the rest of the world agrees
>>that Marx was a communist.
>>
>
> No, Marx was a socialist. His dream was communism, achieved through
> socialist methods.
>
> America is more socialist now than it was 100 years ago.
>
>
Same thing, whatever you say. Is there a significant
distinction?
Either one is antithetical to the constitution.
--
Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on what they
will have for lunch.
More information about the PLUG-talk
mailing list