[PLUG-TALK] Being plonked on plug...
Jeme A Brelin
jeme at brelin.net
Thu Nov 13 22:04:10 UTC 2003
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 11:06, Mark Morgan wrote:
> > Maybe Kulongoski is pro-choice and would like the
> > catholic church to change stance? I went ahead and snipped most of the
> > rest of your post. I'm not interested in a pro-choice debate.
Michael, did you read the last two sentence that you quoted above?
> Maybe?!?!?
> Exactly.
Good, then he hit the nail on the head and you should realize that and
realize exactly "what kind of Catholic" he is. Alright?
> It's wrong to have laws that are based on the assumption that life
> hasn't begun stripping a person of their humanity.
Read this sentence again. Does it make sense? Should there be other
punctuation in there? The phrase "begun stripping" appears in this
sentence and has a specific interpretation that doesn't apply here. You
don't write english very well. I think this belies a certain lack of
focussed thought that is also reflected in your inability to carry an idea
through to full expression.
> There is no reason for two people of the same gender to have anything
> other than sibling, professional, or casual friendship type
> relationships.
What reason does a person need to use physical affection to express their
intimacy?
> The homophobia comment was a thinly concealed attempt to threaten me.
You're paranoid. Seriously. That is not a rational thought.
> The openly gay, openly lesbian, and homosexuals should be able to get
> married advocates want me and people like me to be called bigots and
> homophobes.
If you don't have the vocabulary to express your ideas, at least use
punctuation that makes your meaning clear. You just used the complete
sentence, "homosexuals should be able to get married" as an adjective
without separating it from the rest of the sentence. You're requiring
much more work of the reader than a writer who is careful in his use of
english.
> I'd say the possibility of opposition is scary to Zot.
That doesn't even mean anything.
> Kulongoski betrayed his churched and is in heresy.
Fire up the Inquisition and burn him at the stake, then.
> He does not deserve to be governor of this state nor does he deserve to
> be welcomed at any Catholic church in it either.
Nobody "deserves" anything. We give to them out of our charity and
goodness.
> Kulongoski cannot change the Catholic church's stance on abortion.
Not until he becomes Pope, I suppose. But if a person would like
something in this world to change, he must take a stand and work for that
change, regardless of how realistic the goal.
> Making changes requires one to be a Cardinal or the Pope where the Pope
> has absolute say on any change to matters of faith/morals.
Right. And he's infallible, too. And you wonder why people question your
sanity.
> This is informal communication, I can certainly work on my writing
> style.
It's barely communication at all. We have to try to decipher your
rambling sentences and tie meanings to your non-sequitors. It's too much
work for most people. You could do a whole lot to make yourself
comprehensible, if you are capable of that kind of clear, focussed,
rational thought.
> It's hard to write correctly when your being persecuted.
A persecution complex is a form of paranoid delusion.
> Especially when the list community does little to nothing to stop the
> persecution.
How are you being persecuted in a way that is not in line with, say, your
"persecution" of homosexuals?
You want protection that you do not afford others.
I suggest the Golden Rule...
...but I always do that.
J.
--
-----------------
Jeme A Brelin
jeme at brelin.net
-----------------
[cc] counter-copyright
http://www.openlaw.org
More information about the PLUG-talk
mailing list