[PLUG-TALK] Re: [PLUG] Happy Birthday, Portland!
Jeme A Brelin
jeme at brelin.net
Tue Jan 27 00:14:29 UTC 2004
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 gepr at tempusdictum.com wrote:
> Jeme A Brelin writes:
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 gepr at tempusdictum.com wrote:
> > > Russell Senior writes:
> > > > Define "love".
> > >
> > > This one will do:
> > > 1. A deep, tender, ineffable feeling of affection and solicitude
> > > toward a person, such as that arising from kinship, recognition of
> > > attractive qualities, or a sense of underlying oneness.
> > > 2. A feeling of intense desire and attraction toward a person with
> > > whom one is disposed to make a pair; the emotion of sex and
> > > romance.
> > > 3 a. Sexual passion.
> > > b. Sexual intercourse.
> > > c. A love affair.
> > > 4. An intense emotional attachment, as for a pet or treasured
> > > object.
> > > 5. A person who is the object of deep or intense affection or
> > > attraction; beloved. Often used as a term of endearment.
> > > 6. An expression of one's affection: Send him my love.
> > > 7 a. A strong predilection or enthusiasm: a love of language.
> > > b. The object of such an enthusiasm: The outdoors is her greatest
> > > love.
> > > 8. Love Mythology Eros or Cupid.
> > > 9. often Love Christianity Charity.
> > > 10. Sports A zero score in tennis.
> >
> > That's the closest to it.
> >
> > To love people is to want the best for them and to do whatever you can to
> > make their lives better.
> >
> > Sometimes this means personal sacrifice and it almost always means a
> > little extra effort.
> >
> > This is what we need to do for all things.
>
> I disagree. I think (1-7) are the most frequently used and should be
> the primary references for how people use the word.
Woah... it's a real and valid sense of the word. It is the one that is
meant in that context. You don't mean 3 when you're talking about your
mom or your cat (hopefully) and you don't mean 4 when you're talking about
your lover (hopefully).
You can't just ignore one of the meanings of the word just because it
doesn't fit with your argument.
> "To love people" means "to have an intense emotional attachment to the
> concept of 'people'". It's a generalization and a stereotype just like
> any other.
No, it doesn't. It means, in this context, a charitable feeling toward
all individual people.
> I've also seen it used in the sense of "a strong predilection for
> _interacting_ with other people".
Not here. That's not what it means in this context.
> Thanks for misquoting me, Jeme. [grin] I appreciate the subtlety.
I didn't misquote you. You quoted some dictionary or other's different
meanings of the word and I showed which one I meant.
See, with these sorts of things you CAN just pick one of the meanings and
leave the others. That's how words work.
J.
--
-----------------
Jeme A Brelin
jeme at brelin.net
-----------------
[cc] counter-copyright
http://www.openlaw.org
More information about the PLUG-talk
mailing list