[PLUG-TALK] Is this Marriage Right or Wrong? (possible MRC)
Michael
michael at jamhome.us
Tue Feb 10 23:03:10 UTC 2009
Michael Robinson wrote:
> There is something wrong with the way this question is being posited.
You might be on to something.
> Are we talking about two biological women or a biological
> man and a biological woman?
The latter.
> It's also entirely possible that the no sperm bank was used is a lie.
> Perhaps the no artificial means were used part is a lie.
Are you calling me a liar?
> The biological reality is, it takes a biological man and
> a biological woman for the natural path to conception of
> a human baby.
I'll grant that for the purpose of the discussion.
> This whole thread is purposely misleading. If woman A and woman B
> are a biological man and a biological woman respectively, the marriage
> is possibly valid. Otherwise, there is a problem.
I wanted to know if you would consider the two women married.
The arrangement of their marriage fit your definition.
> Sexual complementarity must be preserved.
Not necessarily. In the case I was describing the biological man was mentally
a woman. (S)he got a sex change operation and is legally a woman.
So we have two women married to each other raising their biological children.
Fits your definition.
--
Michael Rasmussen
http://www.jamhome.us/
Be Appropriate && Follow Your Curiosity
More information about the PLUG-talk
mailing list