[PLUG-TALK] What is Marriage? - biblicat justifications

Someone plug_1 at robinson-west.com
Sat Jan 3 01:23:25 UTC 2009


It doesn
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 16:18 -0800, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 02:53:37PM -0800, Someone wrote:
> > >  I (Michael Rasmussen) had challenged
> > > You haven't answered the question.  Do you eat shellfish or pork?
> > 
> > Of course I eat pork and shellfish, though I don't eat pork on the
> > Fridays of Lent.  That said, Levitical law pertaining to homosexuality
> > is still in force, fully. 
> 
> You're being a hypocrit.  If Levitial laws apply they apply.  You don't get to
> pick and choose.  Your condemnation of homosexuals while breaking the dietary
> aspects of the law is pure self serving hypocracy.
> 
> I suppose next you'll claim to fully support the constitution of the United
> States. 
> 
> > Don't believe me, go to 1 Corinthians.
> 
> I do believe you, for your religion.  Obey it, get your own behavior under
> control.  Matthew 7:3 would be the verse of interest here.
> 
Matthew 7:3 doesn't apply to me in this case because Jesus is against 
homosexuality and Matthew is too.  "Have you not read, that from the
beginning the creator made them male and female and said, 'For this
reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to 
his wife, and the two shall become one flesh?" ( NAB Matthew 19:3-5 )
I'm trying to point out that homosexual behavior is evil to those
who condone or engage in it, a one way ticket to hell.  I'm not
judging, a person with homosexual tendencies doesn't have to engage
in evil after all.  Some of the Levitical laws don't apply today.
Pork isn't as dangerous as it used to be.  Sanitation and
food handling practices have improved markedly.  Just because I
don't adopt all of the Levitical laws, that doesn't mean that I
have to reject the underlying moral teachings on homosexuality.
Why would God teach the Jews that homosexuality is wrong only
to tell Christians something else entirely?  He would be a
hypocrite and God is not a hypocrite.

http://www.helium.com/items/805368-should-homosexuality-be-accepted-in-modern-american-society

has some interesting statistics on the gay AIDS connection.  If there
was no homosexual sex, I bet that AIDS could be stopped.  Didn't AIDS
have it's beginnings in the homosexual community?  Is AIDS a punishment
for the abomination of homosexual sex?  Granted, you don't have to be
gay to develop AIDS.




More information about the PLUG-talk mailing list