[PLUG-TALK] Can't say this about emacs
Paul Heinlein
heinlein at madboa.com
Thu Apr 14 16:59:13 UTC 2011
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Michael wrote:
> vi vi vi is the editor of the beast
It's all about precedence and (assumed) operators, right? I mean, it
could be
666 = literally, as you listed: (vi)(vi)(vi)
5441 = (v)(iv)(iv)(i)
515151 = (v)(i)(v)(i)(v)(i)
* = other combinations as imagination permits
Then there are the assumed operators:
666 = relies on assumed (vi * 100)(vi * 10)(vi * 1) since the
Greek for Rev 13:18 says "six hundred sixty six":
http://www.kimmitt.co.uk/cgi-bin/gnt?id=2713
but it could be
18 = (vi)+(vi)+(vi)
216 = (vi)*(vi)*(vi)
10314424798490535546171949056 = ((vi)^(vi))^(vi)
* = other combinations
So there's a whole lot of assuming going on there. :-P
--
Paul Heinlein <> heinlein at madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/
More information about the PLUG-talk
mailing list