[PLUG-TALK] Risk of earthquake based nuclear problems in USA

Michael Rasmussen michael at jamhome.us
Fri Mar 18 20:07:15 PDT 2011


On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 06:13:01PM -0700, Denis Heidtmann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Michael <michael at jamhome.us> wrote:
> 
> > The NRC updated their risk assessment after the US Geological people
> > updated quake probability and strength maps.  The most vulnerable nuke sites
> > are not in California - though they do rank in the top 10.
> >
> > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42103936/ns/world_news-asiapacific/
> >
> > Interesting risk analysis problem.
> >
> > --
> > Michael Rasmussen
> >
>  You (or anybody) have access to the entire list?  It would be interesting
> to assume events are independent add compute the likelihood of at least one
> event in the U.S. per year.
 

The bottom of the article has a "see more" link that has them all.

-- 
      Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon  
  Trading kilograms for kilometers since 2003
    Be appropriate && Follow your curiosity
          http://www.jamhome.us/
The Fortune Cookie Fortune today is:
Don't throw away your dreams.
    ~ http://someoneoncetoldme.com/gallery/25012008



More information about the PLUG-talk mailing list