[PLUG-TALK] Risk of earthquake based nuclear problems in USA
denis.heidtmann at gmail.com
Sat Mar 19 10:46:11 PDT 2011
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Michael Rasmussen <michael at jamhome.us>wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 06:13:01PM -0700, Denis Heidtmann wrote:
> > You (or anybody) have access to the entire list? It would be
> > to assume events are independent add compute the likelihood of at least
> > event in the U.S. per year.
> Why assume the events are independent? All reactors in a region/seismic
> would be affected at the same time. It is not the case that you have three
> the likelihood of an earthquake because there are three reactors that would
> affected. Unless Murphy really does rule probabilities.
> Michael Rasmussen
True. It was just easier.
But look at this:
Someone selling "news" (and maybe someone selling nuclear power.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the PLUG-talk