[PLUG-TALK] Risk of earthquake based nuclear problems in USA
denis.heidtmann at gmail.com
Sat Mar 19 18:10:44 PDT 2011
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Russell Senior <seniorr at aracnet.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Rasmussen <michael at jamhome.us> writes:
> Denis> You (or anybody) have access to the entire list? It would be
> Denis> interesting to assume events are independent add compute the
> Denis> likelihood of at least one event in the U.S. per year.
> Michael> Why assume the events are independent?
> You can't assume events are independent. Events capable of generating
> failures tend to be highly correlated. ...
> Russell Senior
I agree, but it made the calculation easy to do. With the data at hand, the
result of the assumption produces a worst-case value, I believe. But the
whole thing is tainted because the reported data's applicability has been
brought into question.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the PLUG-talk