[PLUG-TALK] My Condolences to T-Mobile Customers
Russell Johnson
russ at dimstar.net
Tue Mar 22 12:33:29 UTC 2011
On Mar 22, 2011, at 12:25 AM, Russell Senior wrote:
>>>>>> "RJ" == Russell Johnson <russ at dimstar.net> writes:
>
> RJ> It was a long and complicated process where Cingular acquired the
> RJ> what at the time was AT&T, and then renamed itself. There was even
> RJ> a skit about it on the daily show that showed all the players.
>
> "Originally Cingular Wireless LLC, a joint venture between SBC
> Communications and BellSouth, the company acquired the old AT&T
> Wireless in 2004; SBC later acquired the original AT&T and
> re-branded as "The New AT&T". Cingular became wholly owned by The
> New AT&T in December 2006 as a result of AT&T's acquisition of BellSouth."
>
> There is a distinction to be made between AT&T and AT&T Wireless. You
> say Cingular bought AT&T, but it really just bought AT&T Wireless.
>
> SBC and BellSouth owned Cingular.
> Cingular Wireless LLC bought AT&T Wireless.
> SBC bought AT&T
> SBC bought BellSouth to bring though whole thing back together again.
> SBC renamed itself AT&T.
Which does not make my statement any less accurate. We are speaking of two different events.
When you get right down to it, AT&T has been 'reacquiring' it's baby bells almost since the breakup happened. It then spins off parts of itself, only to reacquire that part at a later time.
SO...
AT&T acquired Cingular, then AT&T spun off it's wireless. Cingular acquired AT&T (Wireless). Then Cingular renamed itself to AT&T. Those are the gross facts, without all the fluff. I wasn't making a dissertation on the entire history. Just as the Daily show did, I was making a comment on the fact the AT&T is the T1000 of telephone companies. No matter how many pieces you break it up into, it comes back together.
Russell Johnson
russ at dimstar.net
More information about the PLUG-talk
mailing list