<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Michael Robinson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:plug_1@robinson-west.com">plug_1@robinson-west.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> <a href="http://www.splcenter.org/images/dynamic/intel/SchoenwolfEssay.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.splcenter.org/images/dynamic/intel/SchoenwolfEssay.pdf</a><br>
<br>
</div>Ahem, why should I trust this link?  It isn't from Narth.<br>
What is the reputation of this site?  If Dr so and so is<br>
going to be accused of being racist, the least you can<br>
do is use a reputable source to make claims about what<br>
he said or did not say for that matter.</blockquote><div><br>Right of course.  Since NARTH hasn't publicly refuted comments in that pdf we can safely ignore it as a hoax by someone who is trying to besmirch NARTH's good name.  Then again, you pointed out this link before:<br>
<a href="http://www.narth.com/docs/amok.html">http://www.narth.com/docs/amok.html</a><br><br>And the article appears in the Internet Archive as well:<br><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.narth.com/docs/schoenewolf2.html">http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.narth.com/docs/schoenewolf2.html</a><br>
<br>And finally, why should you trust Narth?<br><br>Jason<br></div></div>