[PLUG] Re: (forw) Re: Thanks for the PGP signature files

[Josh Zeckser]

On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 16:29, Patrick Beart wrote:

> 	This would be a fine and noble thing, if it weren't for the 
> fact that (as far as I can tell) ALL - or nearly all - of the major 
> MUA's are "broken" with respect to the RFC's that specify how a 
> program should handle PGP/GPG "signatures".

You know, I find this strange. I use gnupg at work, and we are required
to use Outlook. GnuPG works just fine with Outlook.


-josh

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.pdxlinux.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20021202/9c012304/attachment.asc>