[PLUG] PLUG resume database project

[Doug Davis]

On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 09:46, Alex Daniloff wrote:
In case of one RAID0 failure,
> remaining 
> database becomes the master and continue to handle load until failed
> RAID0 
> drive is replaced and array is rebuilt. 
> This approach eliminates nessesity in tape drive and periodical backup
> 
> procedures.
2 notes on this. Isn't RAID0 just striping? It provides no data
redundancy, just balances the data between the 2. If you are looking for
redundancy wouldn't RAID 1 be better? Point 2: RAID is not a replacement
for periodic backups. A corrupted database will replicate through all
the RAID drives and you will have no way to recover your data in this
event. 

Doug