Let's drop it (was: Re: [PLUG] What PLUG needs)
Neil Anuskiewicz
neil at pacifier.com
Tue Jun 11 03:59:51 UTC 2002
On 10 Jun 2002, Russell Senior wrote:
> >>>>> "Neil" == Neil Anuskiewicz <neil at pacifier.com> writes:
>
> But what would you _like_ them to be more effective at? You must have
> some sense of why you want these officers. It isn't obvious to me
> that PLUG isn't being "effective", so I don't really see the need for
> change for the sake of change. Show us why officers are necessary
> and/or desirable.
Look, it was an idea. Forget about it, okay? If people don't like my idea
fine but I am already tired of talking about it. I apologize for bringing
it up.
> We _have_ leadership (or not) that is accountable. Someone has an
> idea and either people agree and help or they don't and don't. I
> think it works pretty well and pretty organically, with not a lot of
> overhead. Unless you can come up with some desireable goal that can't
> be accomplished with the organic leadership we have now, then I don't
> see why we should change.
And my idea obviously is not flying so I am now dropping it. :-)
If people were now somewhat enthusiastic about my idea then I would want
to talk about it more. It is not happening.
--
Neil Anuskiewicz
More information about the PLUG
mailing list