[PLUG] networking stumper
Keith Morse
kgmorse at mpcu.com
Tue Oct 8 22:36:37 UTC 2002
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 gilmanhunt at attbi.com wrote:
> The network statistics look like this: (ifconfig eth0)
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:94:AD:93:96
> inet addr:10.10.10.45 Bcast:10.10.10.255
> Mask:255.255.255.0
> EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:65280/53
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500
> Metric:1
> RX packets:31584334 errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0
> frame:0
> TX packets:27420007 errors:90 dropped:0 overruns:0
> carrier:180
> collisions:0
> RX bytes:3049054126 (2907.8 Mb) TX
> bytes:1644590675 (1568.4 Mb)
>
> I'm not that worried about the TX errors: the box has been up for
> 76 days. Before I got this box switched to another network
> segment, this number was ... excessive (on the scale of multiple
> hundreds of collisions per hour).
>
> --------------
> So the question I have today is ...
> Would replacing the card in the Mail server have a greater than
> 50 percent chance of helping the problems with Mail and FTP-
> or do you suppose there's another underlying reason for this?
>
> The card in my linux box seems to work well. Maybe I should
> just swap cards temporarily?
Don't know the specific answer, but will offer this. I've been
configuring a replacement mail server just recently and was experiencing
network outages of either painfully slow or out right dead. When I
finally got around to doing an ifconfig I noticed the RX errors. Not
many, but it would increment. After too much troubleshooting I replaced
the patch cable and that fixed the problem. Overall I learned that RX
errors are really hard on network performance and reliability.
More information about the PLUG
mailing list