[PLUG] Colo recommendations?

[Matt King]

Sure if everyone has about $10,000 to pitch in.  Co-Lo is very expensive
to setup and maintain, with all the power required, clean, redundant
power...and the people to staff it, and the redundant internet
connection...

-- 
Matt King
magnet | internet
http://www.magnetinternet.com

 Robby Russell busted out the keyboard and typed:
> wasn't there the idea of a colo co-op in pdx at one point a long time
> ago? did it every come about? is that still something people would be
> interested in? I'd love to talk to some people who would be interested
> in something like that.
>
> -r0bbY
>
>
>
> <?echo Bear Giles managed to take the time to type out the following:
>> I'm moving to Portland soon (don't worry, I'm bringing my job with me)
>> and am looking for recommendations for Linux- and BSD-friendly colo
>> sites for a couple 2U servers.  I'm much more interested in low cost
>> and
>>  easy access (e.g., for backups) than raw bandwidth, something that I
>> can  get for around $200/month/box in Boulder, if you know where to
>> look.
>>
>> I would also be willing to consider an "in home" setup, if any are
>> suitable.  At my current location the options are Qworst (horrible
>> customer service, low uplink speeds, and did I mention horrible
>> customer
>>  service?  Or the fact that many open relays used to Joe job my domain
>> were Qworst-managed servers?) and AT&T cable modems (no servers,
>> surprisingly spotty service - lots of periods with 75% packet loss.)
>>
>> Bear
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PLUG mailing list
>> PLUG at lists.pdxlinux.org
>> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG at lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug