[PLUG] Issues relating to the PLUG mailing lists

[Chris Jantzen]

On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:14:27AM -0800, Russ Johnson wrote:
> The way I have mine configured, I can hit ",L" (comma, capital 'L') to
> reply to list. At the same time, I can hit ,r to go to the author only,
> and ,g to go to both the author and the list. 

Yeah, thanks to me reading the manual I discovered much of this. :-)

Reply-To: still subverts my desired effect for non-list traffic from
people that *do* use Reply-To: for it's originally intended purpose of
directing recipients to the senders real address (rather than trusting
From:)

Now that I have my client suitably configured to ignore fields the way I
prefer, I'll invariably spark the "Why Did You Cc: Me? I'm Subscribed To
the List" wars. Which will bring up the the "Mail-Followup-To: Isn't a
Real Standard" wars. Which still leads me to believe that Reply-To: is
the root of evil here. I don't see why such an option in your
subscription options can be *harmful*.

-- 
chris kb7rnl =->
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.pdxlinux.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20031203/a19c5134/attachment.asc>