[PLUG] OpenOffice Compile
AthlonRob
AthlonRob at axpr.net
Tue Oct 28 19:22:02 UTC 2003
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 15:41, Mark Morgan wrote:
> AthlonRob said:
> >
> > IIRC, the OpenOffice ebuild strips cflags *because* it is such a
> > terrible thing to build.
>
> I think you might be right. I also tried a build outside of portage and
> that one failed in a different way.
It's an evil thing to compile. I, personally, think it is a decent
enough app to use, although it's very slow and bulky-feeling... but it
isn't meant to be compiled by the likes of you and me.
> The Binary installed easily enough, though I did 'setup -net' and was
> having a bit of a trouble with the local setups until I got rid of the old
> config files. It also helped to install the sun-sdk instead of
> blackdown's java.
That's odd - they seem to want Blackdown instead of Sun. I don't have
any idea why, though. I don't like Java enough to really keep that good
a track of it.
> Now that it's working, it's working well. (Oh, the binary ebuild isn't at
> 1.1 yet though that'll probably change in the next week.)
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge -p openoffice-bin
It's there, it just isn't listed as stable yet, for some reason.
> I probably won't try the actual compile now for a few months. Waiting 12+
> hours for the compile isn't that fun.
It isn't fun at all. It's worse than KDE because it seems to bomb out
more frequently. Oh well. :-)
Rob
More information about the PLUG
mailing list