[PLUG] Reply-To munging considered harmful

Paul Johnson baloo at ursine.ca
Mon Jan 12 18:01:02 UTC 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:07:21PM -0800, Wil Cooley wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 12:02, AthlonRob wrote:
> 
> > I'd set a followup to plug-talk, but we have reply-to munging enabled
> > here, so I guess it will stay here.
> 
> That's no excuse.  Take it to plug-talk.

It does bring up a valid point though:  It's 2004.  Listmaster should
get with the program and stop stomping reply-to, letting people set it
as appropriate to move discussions to different lists or private
email.  If your MUA doesn't have reply-to-list yet, file a bug report,
switch to one that does, or better yet, submit a patch to implement it
in your favorite MUA.

- -- 
 .''`.     Paul Johnson <baloo at ursine.ca>
: :'  :    
`. `'`     proud Debian admin and user
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAA1FAUzgNqloQMwcRAu2SAJ4yb3p3gEGBT8poZQLx4J8vozaUjQCgm3V9
V1RUpAVzQWkqgqVHRf+fT/A=
=DcH4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the PLUG mailing list