[PLUG] Reply-To munging considered harmful
Paul Johnson
baloo at ursine.ca
Mon Jan 12 18:01:02 UTC 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:07:21PM -0800, Wil Cooley wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 12:02, AthlonRob wrote:
>
> > I'd set a followup to plug-talk, but we have reply-to munging enabled
> > here, so I guess it will stay here.
>
> That's no excuse. Take it to plug-talk.
It does bring up a valid point though: It's 2004. Listmaster should
get with the program and stop stomping reply-to, letting people set it
as appropriate to move discussions to different lists or private
email. If your MUA doesn't have reply-to-list yet, file a bug report,
switch to one that does, or better yet, submit a patch to implement it
in your favorite MUA.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <baloo at ursine.ca>
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAA1FAUzgNqloQMwcRAu2SAJ4yb3p3gEGBT8poZQLx4J8vozaUjQCgm3V9
V1RUpAVzQWkqgqVHRf+fT/A=
=DcH4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the PLUG
mailing list