[PLUG] PLUG vs. PLUG

[Robby Russell]

Dan Haskell wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Robby Russell wrote:
> 
> 
>>Did you piss off the keyholder of the mailing list? Perhaps you were 
>>discussing off-topic posts in a linux forum?
> 
> 
> Since when are administrative issues considered off topic?
> 

Since when does a LUG require administrative job duties? You seriously 
take this LUG stuff way too seriously.

PDXLUG was started with the goal of being less formal and more specific 
to linux stuff... and the domain name is privately owned and if the 
owner of said domain so chooses to banish people from utilizing their 
resources, than so be it. I don't agree with it completely, but I will 
not take their freedom away to do just that...nor will I take away your 
attempt to post something linux related on a linux forum. (if it is 
blocked in some way, perhaps one must look back at prior posting to 
figure out why that is the case) However, i am not the one to speak to 
about that...as I am not 'that' key holder.

Perhaps that is where PDXLUG and PLUG differ..(amongst other areas)

once again, I only tried to offer a resource to your group members and 
this is how you return the offer... so in the future, I will remember to 
keep our resources to my/ourselves...as it apparently is not wanted in 
your open group..at least by a few of you because of a naming dispute?

-Robby