[PLUG] PLUG vs. PLUG

[Jeme A Brelin]

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I think it was rather unavoidable because PLUG didn't become PLUUG[1]
> when the name changed to Portland Linux/Unix User's Group.  IMHO, it
> should have.

First, PLUG didn't change, it just adopted an over-arching banner in
addition to the old moniker (see previous references to original
discussion).

Second, it's not Portland Linux/Unix User's Group, but Portland Linux/Unix
Group.

I, myself, once suggested Portland Unix-GNU-Linux Users' Group, but it
didn't fly.

I liked the inclusion of GNU (because CERTAINLY we welcome discussion of
cygwin utilities in addition to the idealistic affiliation) and I liked
the uniqueness of PUGLUG.

J.
-- 
   -----------------
     Jeme A Brelin
    jeme at brelin.net
   -----------------
 [cc] counter-copyright
 http://www.openlaw.org