[PLUG] PLUG vs. PLUG

[Carla Schroder]

On Monday 19 January 2004 7:30 pm, Dan Haskell wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Dan Haskell wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Cliff Wells wrote:
> > 
> > > I have a better solution: PDXLUG can be known as "Portland's Only 
> > > Non-Profit Linux User Group" and that should clear things up.
> > 
> > That would be a very acceptable solution to us. Go for it!
> 
> Robby? Matt? How about it?
> 
> I am not joking here. We could live with that.
> 

Who is this 'we'? There's nothing wrong with PDXLUG, but there sure is 
something wrong with the PLUG list. I've never see such a pack of nitpicky, 
useless, whiny posters who insist on beating irrelevant subjects to death. 
The noise ratio here is unbelievable. I subscribe to a lot of lists, and this 
one has the largest garbage-to-good stuff ratio, by far.

Don't worry, I won't let the door hit me on the way out.
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carla Schroder
www.tuxcomputing.com
this message brought to you
by Libranet 2.8 and Kmail
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~