[PLUG] Conclusion to PDXLUG argument
Cliff Wells
cwells at commandprompt.com
Wed Jan 21 10:03:01 UTC 2004
Dan Haskell wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Cliff Wells wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 20:11, Cliff Wells wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 16:42, Dan Haskell wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>There is usually a direct correlation between the way Dan is treated and
>>>>the way Dan responds. Application of that simple rule will tell you what
>>>>is going to happen in the future.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Dan is treated like an idiot so he acts like one? Even down to
>>>referring to himself in the third person? Is there a medical term for
>>>this condition?
>>>
>>>
>>Okay, I'm sorry. You're just such an easy target. Try not to take
>>yourself so seriously and I'll try not to laugh at you.
>>
>>
>
>No you're not sorry. You're just a clueless troll, doing what clueless
>trolls do best.
>
>
You're right. I'm not sorry. I was being sarcastic and thought it was
obvious. It's rather sad to finally see you correct about something and
still appear a bit dull at the same time. Why don't you just give
up? All I want to hear is that you are done slandering PDXLUG in
public and I'll cease and go back under my bridge. Have you noticed
that I only *respond* to posts, that I never start new threads? Is
that enough of a clue-by-four for you? Really, this conversation is
entirely in your hands. I would be delighted to get some other work
done and leave you in peace.
Cliff
More information about the PLUG
mailing list