[PLUG] Conclusion to PDXLUG argument

Cliff Wells cwells at commandprompt.com
Wed Jan 21 10:03:01 UTC 2004


Dan Haskell wrote:

>On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Cliff Wells wrote:
>
>  
>
>>On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 20:11, Cliff Wells wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 16:42, Dan Haskell wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>There is usually a direct correlation between the way Dan is treated and
>>>>the way Dan responds. Application of that simple rule will tell you what
>>>>is going to happen in the future.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Dan is treated like an idiot so he acts like one?  Even down to
>>>referring to himself in the third person?  Is there a medical term for
>>>this condition?
>>>      
>>>
>>Okay, I'm sorry.  You're just such an easy target.  Try not to take
>>yourself so seriously and I'll try not to laugh at you.
>>    
>>
>
>No you're not sorry. You're just a clueless troll, doing what clueless
>trolls do best.
>  
>

You're right.  I'm not sorry.  I was being sarcastic and thought it was 
obvious.  It's rather sad to finally see you correct about something and 
still appear a bit dull at the same time.   Why don't you just give 
up?   All I want to hear is that you are done slandering PDXLUG in 
public and I'll cease and go back under my bridge.   Have you noticed 
that I only *respond* to posts, that I never start new threads?   Is 
that enough of a clue-by-four for you?   Really, this conversation is 
entirely in your hands.   I would be delighted to get some other work 
done and leave you in peace.


Cliff




More information about the PLUG mailing list