[PLUG] Mail access from laptop on the LAN

[Anthony Schlemmer]

Rich Shepard wrote:

>On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Anthony Schlemmer wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Why is bind less secure?
>>    
>>
>
>Tony,
>
>  It's what I've read from folks much more informed than am I.
>
>  Please remember that linux is about choices: most options are different
>but not necessarily better or worse. I like emacs (and joe), you like vi. I
>like pine, you like mutt. I like Slackware, you like Debian. So what? Do we
>care? Not I. As long as it does the job, is easy to install, configure and
>maintain the choice doesn't matter to me.
>
>  I'm glad that folks are happy with bind, sendmail or whatever. I'm happy
>with tinydns, postfix and the otherever. :-) If you want to discuss values
>and beliefs I'm sure there are plenty of Usenet newsgroups available. And,
>let's not forget talk radio on the AM band.
>
>Rich
>
>  
>
Well Rich I only asked a simple question about why you think tinydns is 
more secure than bind. I wasnt't asking or looking to discuss beliefs etc...

Tony

-- 
Anthony Schlemmer
aschlemm at comcast.net