[PLUG] Confusion about scsi standards...

Wed Jun 9 11:53:02 UTC 2004

On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 11:28:51AM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > From: Michael Robinson <plug_0 at robinson-west.com>
> > 
> > I'm looking into why I'm getting IO errors with my scsi drives.  
> > Thinking it's a bad cable, I now wonder if I need a newer card
> > that is more recent on the LVD/se standards?  The drives are Compaq 
> > MODEL MA3043LP.  The label says Wide Ultra 2 scsi. 
> 
> These drives new? Do the drive labels say "LVD" or differential?
> 
> If not most likely those are non-differential 40MB/s drives.

Technically, Ultra 2 is LVD. It is *sometimes* still misapplied in
marketing labels, though.

-- 
chris kb7rnl =->
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.pdxlinux.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20040609/3e1df25c/attachment.asc>