[PLUG] Samba, LDAP, and my sanity.
Wil Cooley
wcooley at nakedape.cc
Mon Mar 8 17:52:01 UTC 2004
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 17:45, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> I believe you're asking the wrong question. The answer lies not in SAMBA,
> but in PAM. PAM controls with authentication methods are considered
> for your environment. PAM orders the sequence of authentication tries.
> PAM is your friend.
Only if you disable encrypted passwords over the wire, which is not
recommended, because it's insecure and because it's a hassle to install
the appropriate registry setting on each system.
Wil
--
Wil Cooley wcooley at nakedape.cc
Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc
* * * * * * Linux Consulting in Portland, Oregon * * * * * *
* Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc *
* Naked Ape Business Server http://nakedape.cc/r/smb *
* Easy, reliable solutions for small businesses *
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.pdxlinux.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20040308/4bad7d8c/attachment.asc>
More information about the PLUG
mailing list