[PLUG] Athlon-64 Laptops
E. Rogan Creswick
creswick at cs.orst.edu
Mon Mar 15 21:56:02 UTC 2004
I'm running dual-opteron 240's in a (currently) 32-bit debian
install, and it is extremely zippy. (2.4.18 kernel compile in 1:06).
While I haven't played with the laptops, and the AMD-64's have less
I/O than the opterons, I would still reccomend them over a p4 or
p4m. I wouldn't expect to run a 64-bit environment without a great
deal of work though.
Looking at the Gentoo-64 technotes/forums may be a good thing to do,
since many of the issues that arise there are not tied to gentoo.
(For example, lilo dosen't work with amd-64 at the moment, and grub
dosen't compile under amd-64--not a big deal, but worth knowing).
phillip writes:
> Actually in the benchmarks that i've pounded through(all on 32 bit
> windows). The AMD-64 laptops give 2+hours of gaming on battery,
> and 3-3.5 hours doing standard things such as web browsing and
> simple tasks, and dvd playing somewhere in-between. On windows the
> Athlon-64 underclocks to 800mhz(although
Just a side note about AMD-64 performance.. the amd-64 chips are a
great example of frequency (mhz) as a meaningless measurement. The
1.4ghz opteron is _much_ faster than the 1.4 ghz Athlon MP, even in
32-bit environments.
> doesn't affect performance as expected) from 2ghz when on battery saver mode,
> so it saves quite a bit of battery life when you don't need the "extra
> performance".
>
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG at lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
More information about the PLUG
mailing list