[PLUG] Is Debian that hard to work with, or am I that dumb?
Paul Johnson
baloo at ursine.ca
Wed Mar 24 19:16:02 UTC 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
AthlonRob <AthlonRob at axpr.net> writes:
> On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 18:07, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Wil Cooley <wcooley at nakedape.cc> writes:
>>
>> > So why don't you just go with Red Hat Enterprise 2.1 Basic Ed?
>>
>> Probably because it's RPM based and thus belongs to history?
>
> Yeah, those RPM distros belong the same place as those DEB distros.
> Hopefully we'll all move on sometime soon.
Only the Debian installer belongs in the past. We all agree on that.
It was a good installer back in 1997, but PNP hardware actually works
reasonably well now. I haven't been following debian-boot, so I don't
know what approach they're taking exactly. But with PNP being as good
as it is now, I assume there's not much reason for the installer to do
any hardware detection beyond what a normal boot-up would: just
compile everything as modules and let discover do it's job.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <baloo at ursine.ca>
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
`- Debian. Because it *must* work. debian.org aboutdebian.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAYk7qUzgNqloQMwcRAjzXAJ9jFm/RE7SajlUFQb8yqkyBA56BkACeMfNm
8tHiaJoVAnW4D8XHihFm9WQ=
=zKhI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the PLUG
mailing list