[PLUG] Slowest Full duplex 100MB in the west
Steve Beattie
steve at wirex.net
Tue Mar 15 05:36:26 UTC 2005
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:02:21PM -0800, Jeme A Brelin wrote:
> Doesn't appear to be errors... unless it's a single digit tally in mod 5.
Errrr? What do you mean?
> jbrelin at robot:~# ifconfig eth0
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:E5:A5:34
> inet addr:10.42.42.41 Bcast:10.42.42.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:8794083 errors:42726 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:63831
------------------------------>^^^^^^^^^^^^
> TX packets:10335895 errors:4 dropped:0 overruns:1 carrier:3
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> RX bytes:707763483 (674.9 MiB) TX bytes:4100642016 (3.8 GiB)
> Interrupt:16 Base address:0xdc00
Looks like packets going from person to robot are getting corrupted
somehow. Not that that helps you diagnose it.
> >Heck, maybe someone installed bandwidth-limiting as a gag. ;)
>
> I would say that is looking to be the most sensible thing, were it not
> totally non-sensical.
Always worth looking to see if you have iptables rules or traffic
control rules (man tc(8)) that might be interfering.
--
Steve Beattie Don't trust programmers?
<steve at wirex.net> Complete StackGuard distro at
http://NxNW.org/~steve/ immunix.org
http://www.sardonix.org -- Audit code, earn respect.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.pdxlinux.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20050314/da4a26f9/attachment.asc>
More information about the PLUG
mailing list