[PLUG] Slowest Full duplex 100MB in the west

Steve Beattie steve at wirex.net
Tue Mar 15 05:36:26 UTC 2005


On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:02:21PM -0800, Jeme A Brelin wrote:
> Doesn't appear to be errors... unless it's a single digit tally in mod 5.

Errrr? What do you mean?

> jbrelin at robot:~# ifconfig eth0
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:A0:CC:E5:A5:34
>           inet addr:10.42.42.41  Bcast:10.42.42.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:8794083 errors:42726 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:63831
------------------------------>^^^^^^^^^^^^

>           TX packets:10335895 errors:4 dropped:0 overruns:1 carrier:3
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:707763483 (674.9 MiB)  TX bytes:4100642016 (3.8 GiB)
>           Interrupt:16 Base address:0xdc00

Looks like packets going from person to robot are getting corrupted
somehow. Not that that helps you diagnose it. 

> >Heck, maybe someone installed bandwidth-limiting as a gag. ;)
> 
> I would say that is looking to be the most sensible thing, were it not 
> totally non-sensical.

Always worth looking to see if you have iptables rules or traffic
control rules (man tc(8)) that might be interfering.

-- 
Steve Beattie                               Don't trust programmers?
<steve at wirex.net>                         Complete StackGuard distro at
http://NxNW.org/~steve/                            immunix.org
        http://www.sardonix.org -- Audit code, earn respect.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.pdxlinux.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20050314/da4a26f9/attachment.asc>


More information about the PLUG mailing list