[PLUG] Slowest Full duplex 100MB in the west
Ronald Chmara
ron at Opus1.COM
Tue Mar 15 11:12:18 UTC 2005
On Mar 15, 2005, at 2:12 AM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> Ronald Chmara wrote:
>>> Errrr? What do you mean?
>>>> jbrelin at robot:~# ifconfig eth0
>>>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:E5:A5:34
>>>> inet addr:10.42.42.41 Bcast:10.42.42.255
>>>> Mask:255.255.255.0
>>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>>>> RX packets:8794083 errors:42726 dropped:0 overruns:0
>>>> frame:63831
>>> ------------------------------>^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> That's not enough to cause the level of losses you were talking
>> about....
> Sure it is, if the errors occured during the ftp process.
'splain, please. That's only 0.4 percent of packets, so unless each bad
packet triggered a fairly *lengthy* re-negotiation process, I'm not
seeing how it would drop a 100Mb/s to 8KB/s. Maybe 100Mb/s
(theoretical) to 30 Mb/s (actual), but 64 Kb/s? Roughly five hundred
times slower?
> Thus he needs to follow Wil's suggestion to use mii-tool and
> force the client to auto, then 100/full, then 100/half and test
> the throughput under each scenario.
I do agree that this is a good test. However, I'm used to duplexing
madness dropping a 100Mb down to 30 Mb/s speeds, but I've never seen
duplexing issues drop a connection down to 8KB (64Kb) speed. To drop
that low, I'd guess crappy cables, or *serious* interference, or
something similar on the physical layer...
-Bop
More information about the PLUG
mailing list