[PLUG] migrating to new uid/gid
Vram
lamsokvr at xprt.net
Sat Nov 26 07:52:10 UTC 2005
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 20:24 -0800, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> >From: Vram <lamsokvr at xprt.net>
> > On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 12:19 -0800, Galen Seitz wrote:
> > > Russell Senior <seniorr at aracnet.com> wrote:
> > > > # find / -uid <uid>
> > > >
> > > > etc?
> > >
> > > That's really what I meant when I said recursive chown. I'm just wondering
> > > if the numeric uid/gid is hiding in any other files.
> >
> >
> > In general users can only own files in
> >
> > /home/user
> > /tmp/user
> >
> >
> > Correct me if I am wrong...
>
> Dead wrong. At a minimum add /var/mail and /var/tmp. Fairly often there
> is /usr/tmp and /usr/local/tmp (fairly often linked to another tmp and
> rarely used, but folks can create files there). In the general case using
> `find` is highly recommended in order to guarentee you capture any extra
> files.
>
Right.. After I posted that I did a find .... And of course I have
mail... So I have files over there...
But, when he changes /etc/passwd and /etc/group those files will
follow the change.. This creates dead files but, that is a different
proble...
I don't have a /usr/tmp or /usr/local/tmp soo.......
I agree use find...
I still stand by my original statement...
Vram
>
> >From: AthlonRob <athlonrob at axpr.net>
> > Galen Seitz wrote:
> > > I've got write permission to /usr/local.
> >
> > Why would you do that?
>
> Because it is handy. Things directly under /usr are generally considered
> more secure than /usr/local. As /usr/local tends to be left out of $PATH
> for SUID programs, the hazard from allowing it is not too large (doesn't
> mean I do so though).
>
>
More information about the PLUG
mailing list