[PLUG] local hardware
Steve Bonds
1s7k8uhcd001 at sneakemail.com
Fri Mar 24 06:24:55 UTC 2006
On 3/23/06, Steve Bonds 1s7k8uhcd001-at-sneakemail.com wrote:
> My only concern is VMware now coredumps a lot, which is bad since
> that's all this box does. However, I'm a revision behind on their
> beta server so I'll upgrade and see how it goes. I'm a bit puzzled
> why everything else would work great yet have one application choke...
It turns out the problem is the AMD processor. I figured AMD or Intel
made little difference-- but I was wrong.
AMD64 processors do not keep themselves in time sync on multiprocessor
systems. VMware was getting confused because it would send a SCSI
command to its virtual disk, then when it checked how long it took it
came up with a negative number and panicked.
The workaround is to tell each virtual machine to only run on a single
processor. This nicely fixed the coredumps.
Description of the source of the problem (SCSI timings):
http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=7644
The official fixes:
http://www.vmware.com/support/kb/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=2041 (didn't work)
http://www.vmware.com/support/kb/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=2039 (did work)
Some other folks who suffered my same fate:
http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=20973
http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=19953
Fortunately, with this fix my new system is all working now!
If I had to do it over I'd probably get an Intel dual-core processor
on an Intel motherboard-- a bit pricier, but probably fewer surprises
in the long run.
-- Steve
More information about the PLUG
mailing list