[PLUG] SCSI verses SATA RAID

Lancashire, Pete plancashire at ci.portland.or.us
Fri Mar 31 17:18:04 UTC 2006


Not to fuel, but there are a lot of really crappy
performance SCSI RAID5 adapters out there. I've
not looked at what is being made now days, but it
seems ever since Adaptec bought out the competitors
performance gains have not been that great.

My 'gold standard' is raid5 at 'wire speed'. It
can be done but is expensive and so far have only
seen it in a fibre channel array.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roderick A. Anderson [mailto:raanders at acm.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 9:09 AM
> To: PLUG
> Subject: [PLUG] SCSI verses SATA RAID
> 
> 
> Get your cans of fuel and matches ready.
> 
> ...
> 
> What are your thoughts on SCSI verses SATA RAID?
> 
> Assume RAID cards not software RAID.
> 
> Cost is not the biggest issue though the cost savings of SATA mean 
> more/bigger drives.
> 
> SCSI typically has a longer warranty ( 5 years ).
> 
> 
> So let the flames begin!  :-)
> 
> 
> TIA,
> Rod
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG at lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
> 



More information about the PLUG mailing list