[PLUG] First Tech Credit Union "microsoftens" web interface

Lancashire, Pete plancashire at ci.portland.or.us
Fri May 5 19:14:57 UTC 2006


todays rant

save documentation in plain ascii text, append the
filename to have .txt at the end.

submit it

it is rejected because it is not in an acceptable format.

s/txt$/doc/ the filename, and resubmit

documentation accepted with a 'very well done' reply

-pete



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lancashire, Pete [mailto:plancashire at ci.portland.or.us]
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 12:11 PM
> To: 'General Linux/UNIX discussion and help; civil and on-topic'
> Subject: RE: [PLUG] First Tech Credit Union "microsoftens" 
> web interface
> 
> 
> May I see the standard, policy or procedure on software testing ?
> 
> they are ...
> 
> What standard, policy, or procedure do you use to comfirm the software
> provided
> meets the terms of the contract ?
> 
> ah ... 
> 
> What standard, policy, or procedure do you use to determine 
> if the contract
> should be considered complete and payment made ?
> 
> well ...
> 
> -pete "can't say where those questions were wanted to be asked"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fh hillsboro [mailto:linux at frankhunt.com]
> > Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 12:04 PM
> > To: General Linux/UNIX discussion and help; civil and on-topic
> > Subject: Re: [PLUG] First Tech Credit Union "microsoftens" 
> > web interface
> > 
> > 
> > I am seeing similar issues:
> > 
> > RANT = ON
> > 1) they conveniently allow for the "Naming" of accounts.  
> > This is a good 
> > thing, especially if, like my family, you have three checking 
> > accounts 
> > and several savings accounts.  Now, along comes bill payer 
> > insisting on 
> > an ACCOUNT NUMBER.  Huh?  Of course all the account numbers 
> > changed so 
> > you have to look that up first.
> > 2) again with bill payer - what is error 171?
> > 3) still more with bill payer - how come it cant seem to 
> > figure out that 
> > 82 and 82.00 are the same?  The old system could.
> > 4) they need better music on hold since I have spent several 
> > hours there 
> > (no joy).
> > 5) still even more with bill payer - I tried to pay a bill 
> > this AM.  It 
> > was "accepted" but there is no record that it was paid.  It 
> is not in 
> > any of the transaction logs.  SO, I tried paying it AGAIN.  
> > This time I 
> > get: 
> > The payment for the following payee(s) could not be processed!
> > Please check the amount and Withdrawal date.
> > AT&T
> > 
> > a) the amount is correct
> > b) i tried several withdrawal dates
> > 6) when sending a complaint from the "contact us" page, I 
> get: We are 
> > sorry. Your post was not received at this time. Please try 
> > again later.
> > 
> >  *WTFO???*
> > 
> > I am curious if ANY testing was done with this software.  Based on 
> > empirical data, the answer is NOPE.
> > 
> > Set RANT=OFF
> > 
> > 
> > Sorry, I just had to vent.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Galen Seitz wrote:
> > > Russ Johnson <russj at dimstar.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >   
> > >> Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> > >>     
> > >>> Any other First Tech Credit Union customers here?  They 
> shut down
> > >>> from April 28 through March 1, to bring up a new web 
> > interface.  It
> > >>> came up today (Tuesday), and was very slow.  It seems to 
> > be Internet
> > >>> Explorer specific, and less capable than the old web 
> > interface.  It
> > >>> did not receive much independent testing.
> > >>>
> > >>>       
> > >> I'm not having any issues with Firefox and the 1st Tech 
> > online banking...
> > >>     
> > >
> > > I just logged in and encountered the following problems.
> > >
> > > 1. username is partially obscured by surrounding box
> > >
> > > 2. password manager offers to remember the login, but only 
> > has a single
> > >    button labeled "OK".
> > >
> > > 3. link to history before May is missing.  This morning it 
> > was there,
> > >    but brought up a blank window.  I guess that's one way 
> > to solve the
> > >    problem.
> > >
> > >
> > > I know other members that are seeing accounts that don't 
> > belong to them
> > > listed in with their own.  You might want to keep a close 
> > watch on your
> > > account until the dust settles.
> > >
> > >
> > > galen
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > PLUG mailing list
> > > PLUG at lists.pdxlinux.org
> > > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > >
> > >   
> > 
> > -- 
> > Frank Hunt
> > Confused Linux Admin
> > General Nuisance
> > Web Weasel
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > PLUG mailing list
> > PLUG at lists.pdxlinux.org
> > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG at lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
> 



More information about the PLUG mailing list