[PLUG] Suse 10.1

[Auke Kok]

Carla Schroder wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 October 2006 12:50, Robert Kopp wrote:
>> Carlos Konstanski <ckonstanski at pippiandcarlos.com> wrote: When I 
> say "supported", I am strictly speaking in the corporate sense.
>> If I do anything that voids the service agreement, that is unsupported.
>> It matters not a bit that I will never use the service agreement, ever.
>>
>> "Supported" also means that there is someone to sue if something goes
>> wrong.
> 
> This is repeated so often I'm starting to think it's a myth. Has anyone ever 
> actually sued a tech vendor? You'd think Microsoft would be the leader in 
> lawsuits from unhappy customers.

the last time I looked in a disctionary the words 'supports' and 'is liable' were 
different. Now I know that some people tend to disagree, but I'm pretty sure that 
Microsoft's laywers will never ever let those two words cover the same legal meaning 
without a fight to the bitter end ;)

Cheers,

Auke