[PLUG] reply-to curiosity...
Kris
krisa at subtend.net
Wed Aug 15 09:00:05 UTC 2007
Jeme A Brelin wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, someone wrote:
>> Is there some reason why the reply-to for many postings on this list
>> is set to the author's email address? Am I alone in considering this
>> policy annoying.
>
> The Reply-To header should always be set to the author's address. The
> fact that this list munges the headers to set them to the list address
> is not only annoying, but downright broken.
There are many "reply-to-harmful" and "reply-to-not-harmful" opinions out there.
This list is both a community and a very useful knowledge base.
Reply-to-the-list keeps that knowledge flowing back to the community. It is
more useful for this kind of technical list to have the occasional oops
regarding a private message, than many oops' of useful technical replies heading
towards a private mailbox with no list follow up.
I say keep it the way it is. At a minimum you get a chuckle out of a private
reply. At a maximum you get a glimpse into someone's true intentions and
personality. Occasionally you get an accidental phone # into the archives,
which the admin should be able to help with.
--
I'm just a packet pusher.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.pdxlinux.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20070815/9ee30aa6/attachment.asc>
More information about the PLUG
mailing list