[PLUG] Bug-tracking software.
Paul Heinlein
heinlein at madboa.com
Mon May 14 17:33:10 UTC 2007
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Rogan Creswick wrote:
> Trac is the best option that I know of, but honestly, we don't need
> a wiki, and we especially don't need another markup language to
> learn (we use a twiki for most of our internal documentation).
> This could be mitigated with a Trac WikiProcessor, but it's still
> solves a lot of problems we don't have, and it doesn't look easy to
> trim the system down so that it's just a bug tracker.
I use Trac/Subversion for IT configuration management. Key things I
like:
* People can browse source code without having to check it out. That
may not be important in your situation, but it's great for sysadmin
stuff, e.g., people who want to look at the aliases file.
* When tickets are different in terms of particulars but share
similar themes, a wiki page is a great place to document
the overlap. Since tickets use wiki markup, building links
to the wiki page, related tickets, and, if necessary, the
underlying source code is easy.
* I've yet to see a body of source code that can't benefit from
meta-documents that discuss organization, code style, future
plans, known errors, etc. The Trac wiki is superb for that.
* It's true that Twiki's markup is somewhat different than Trac's
(which is MoinMoin-based), but our own internal conversion was
very smooth. I wrote a LastModified macro that duplicates Twiki's
nifty last-change feature -- and my Python skills are next to
non-existent. :-) Our Twiki users were able to migrate to Trac
quite easily.
--
Paul Heinlein <> heinlein at madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/
More information about the PLUG
mailing list