[PLUG] Any good Linux compatible WYSIWYG HTML editor why separate layout/content

[Carlos Konstanski]

Michael writes:
 > 
 > Brent Rieck wrote:
 > > I've *never* had a legitimate text-only browser hit
 > > any of the websites I've ever worked on and I consider it an absolute
 > > and total waste of time developing for text-only users.
 > 
 > And I recently had support for text browsers listed as a site redesign
 > criteria. The owners of the site know more about their clients than I do.
 > 
 > -- 
 >      Michael Rasmussen
 >  Be Appropriate && Follow Your Curiosity
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > PLUG mailing list
 > PLUG at lists.pdxlinux.org
 > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Would not text-only compatibility be easily implementable with the CSS
paradigm we're pushing?  Lynx would simply ignore the styles, and all
that's left is the content (and [lack of] javascript; here is where
you would have to spend compatibility efforts).

An actual place I've used text/plain HTTP responses is in web actions
that are designed to be called from cron, and their output parsed by
another program.  I call it poorman's SOA.
-- 
Carlos Konstanski