[PLUG] FG server versus portable drive
John Jason Jordan
johnxj at comcast.net
Tue Jun 17 16:57:32 UTC 2008
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:48:40 -0700
Keith Lofstrom <keithl at kl-ic.com> dijo:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 09:33:59PM -0700, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> >
> > I don't mind sharing a bit in the expense of something like this.
> > However, I have to say that I do not understand what y'all are
> > proposing and why it would be better than a USB disk. What would be the
> > transfer rate from the server?
>
> Alternative USB: Storing the distro library on John's USB drive:
>
> A1) Advantage: John knows how to do this, and is willing to do the work.
>
> A2) Advantage: Nothing to negotiate with free geek.
>
> A3) Disadvantage: The number of distros would be limited to what fits
> on the 60GB drive. That is actually not very many, especially if
> some are DVD distros (we will see more of those in the future).
>
> A4) Disadvantage: John might forget to bring the drive, or might lose
> it, or drop it. Back to square one.
>
> A5) We would be burning most of the CDs at the Clinic on John's laptop.
> There are better uses for his time.
No, it is a USB drive, so distros can be burned from anyone's computer
as long as it has a USB 2.0 port.
> Alternative Server: Distro library on a server at Free Geek:
>
> B1) Advantage: We can store a LOT more distros on a fixed server with a
> big disk. I would like to store all the Redhats and Fedoras, Debians,
> Ubuntus (various flavors), and OpenSUSE and Slackwares, in time.
>
> B2) Advantage: We can make potentially it an update mirror, also. Ubuntu
> likes to do updates, and it would save a lot of bandwidth if we could
> do that locally.
>
> B3) Advantage: Mucho bandwidth. The local network is faster than a USB
> link. Desktop/server hard drives are faster than notebook drives.
>
> B4) Everybody can access it, we aren't tying up John's laptop.
>
> B5) Advantage: We can set up a partially automated process, using a
> wiki page as a request page, to download more distros.
>
> B6) Neutral: We will still be downloading stuff, probably more stuff
> than the burst of activity during the clinic, but we can run the
> downloads during slack times at night.
>
> B7) Disadvantage: It will be running continuously, consuming power and
> space and needing some maintenance.
>
> B8) Disadvantage: We will need permission from Free Geek, and there
> will be folks that want to change/control what we do.
>
> B9) Disadvantage: It will be somewhat harder to set up the process
> and the "add a distro" process will need a maintainer.
>
> B10)Disadvantage: It may be difficult to set up the mirror and
> update process to seamlessly work with standard Ubuntu and yum
> update mirror selection processes.
>
> B11)Disadvantage: It will cost a few hundred dollars for drives.
> I imagine we can get the rest of the hardware from Free Geek.
>
>
> I hope that makes my proposal a little more understandable. Again, we
> can do the initial load on the local network at PSU from their local
> mirrors.
It is now morning and my brain is sort of functioning again. (Sort of
is the best it gets.)
I now remember that I also have a 160 GB USB drive that I have not used
for years. It is the size of a thick hard bound book and needs a wall
wart. Not as convenient as my little shirt pocket 60 GB drive, but
still eminently portable.
More information about the PLUG
mailing list