[PLUG] How many of us write small scripts?
Tim Wescott
tim at wescottdesign.com
Sun Dec 13 01:01:24 UTC 2009
Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> The most significant attraction of Linux/Unix for me is how easy
> it is to do "cheap programming" - shell scripts, perl scripts, etc.
> I am a mediocre programmer, but with Linux and a little bit of
> knowledge I am able to automate many small tasks. This usually
> means that I forget how to run some commands, because I have buried
> them in scripts in /usr/local/bin or ~/bin . Since I can *read* the
> scripts later on (especially if I add a few lines of comments) that
> is actually an automated way to remember stuff without wasting a
> lot of attention on it.
>
> Many PLUG members seem to spend most of their time in GUI-land.
> Which is good, if all the visual metaphors are consistent and the
> right tools are available. But it is much harder to automate
> small hacks that way - you become dependent on others who are
> skilled with gtk or qt and c++, who spend days to months polishing
> their creations with check boxes and options.
>
> So, I'm curious ... how many of us know enough to write quick shell
> scripts? How many of us know how to write quick 5 minute GUI hacks?
>
> Perhaps I can help teach some scripting, and learn some GUI hacking
> from others. The real value of open source systems is that they
> empower us to create, not just consume.
>
I know enough to write quick shell scripts, but I don't often do it
unless it's for some unique twist to a makefile.
Define GUI hack! Can I, in 5 minutes, even _find_ where Scilab or
OpenOffice keeps it's UI code to change things to my liking? Nope. Do
I have the courage (or foolhardiness)? Nope. Or do you mean there's
GUI things that are there for me to hack?
--
Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
Voice: 503-631-7815
Cell: 503-349-8432
http://www.wescottdesign.com
More information about the PLUG
mailing list