[PLUG] Motherboard recommendations
Roderick A. Anderson
raanders at cyber-office.net
Wed Mar 11 03:31:19 UTC 2009
Rogan Creswick wrote:
> I'm putting together a linux compute/shell server for my office (of
> windows users -- one step at a time :).
>
> We've need a box like this for a while, and the key features are:
>
> * Lots of ram (we often load multi-gb data sets--4-8gb is minimum)
> * 64-bit arch, so a jvm can actually address the ram (32-bit jvms
> are essentially unable to use more than 3gb)
> * Large & fast disks (I'm looking at 2 2TB WD. 7.2k rpm sata drives.)
> * more than one core / cpu.
Take a look at the offerings at pogolinux.com You may find it is
cheaper, in the long run and your time, to buy a pre-built system and if
not you can at least see what they feel comfortable offering.
Several years ago I ordered a system but wanted it with the latest
version of a SCSI RAID host controller (with battery backup - if memory
serves me right). Before I could get a quote out of them their
engineers acquired and tested the card to make sure it would play well
with the rest of the system.
Rod
--
>
> I think I have a pretty good idea of what we want (list is below) but
> I really don't have a clue re: motherboards (and, by extension,
> everything else I've selected may need to change.)
>
> The big questions are:
>
> * Does the formfactor really matter? Space is not an issue, but it
> may be difficult to find a place for a rack mount (Our "rack" only has
> a front mounting bracket, and no rear supports -- it just holds
> switches and a kvm)
>
> * Memory: quantity or speed? I know this is very hard to answer
> without knowing exactly how we'll be using the machine, but it's also
> very hard to know exactly how we'll be using the machine... Roughly
> -- When we can fill 8gb of memory, we'll need more than 16 -- so we
> won't be able to write sloppy code just because we have loads of ram
> (which is really too bad .. that would be a huge time/money savings if
> we could). The only difference is probably going to be the number of
> distinct disk reads. When doing massive data processing on this
> machine, very little will be going on, so swapping out isn't going to
> be much of an issue (we can just ensure that the environment we're
> running in fits in memory, and manage the disk access on our own--the
> stuff we do makes that feasible, and often necessary.) So, that seems
> to mean to me, that the only difference is how many times we need to
> read/write to/from disk, *not* the amount of data we actually
> transfer. Given that the speed difference seems pretty substantial
> (ddr800 vs. ddr1066), faster ram seems the way to go, but, I may
> simply not know how to configure a system to use 16gb of ddr1066+ ram.
> Any feedback would be great!
>
> Here's the system I'm considering:
>
> (+
> $ cost
> 144 ; ram: 8 gigs
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231195
> 80 ; mobo: (micro atx?!)
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128379
> 193 ; AMD Quad-core Phenome II & fan:
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.163672
> 600 ; drives (2 2TB WD SATA)
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136344
> 20 ; dvd/cd
> ; case? (micro atx?) & powersupply
> )
> $1037 ;; well within our budget. What else would you add / change?
>
> Thanks!
> Rogan
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG at lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
More information about the PLUG
mailing list