[PLUG] OO.o vs. LO

MJang mike at linuxexam.com
Tue Jun 7 23:13:42 PDT 2011

On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 16:38 -0700, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Joe Shisei Niski wrote:
> > The compatibility with MS Office 2007 .docx and .xlsx files is all but
> > nonexistent, and the presentation program still chokes on the simplest
> > PowerPoint files. It's not business-class interoperable with MS Office.
> Joe,
>    That's interesting. What I read in the comparison is that LO has better
> support for M$, particularly the newer versions.

I haven't converted yet, but gather third-hand that many of the original
OOo developers have moved to LO. So longer term, I'd expect LO to exceed
the quality of OOo.


More information about the PLUG mailing list