[PLUG] awk syntax error, part ii
Rich Shepard
rshepard at appl-ecosys.com
Fri May 25 21:25:53 UTC 2012
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Larry Brigman wrote:
> Well none of the other chemicals had a filter match with a value of 0.000.
> The only match from the filter for chemical was Cr but it had a -0.006
> Ba,Bi and Cd had 0.000 but nothing was in the filter for them. I added two
> valued to the table to check that it work and they matched and changed the
> values.
I found those with a stated reporting level but not those without that
level. Plenty of zeros in the latter category.
Thanks for the lessons,
Rich
More information about the PLUG
mailing list