[PLUG-TALK] Personal attacks

[Mark]

Jeme A Brelin wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Mark wrote:
> 
>>Well, technically you're correct the systems don't alias rm to rm -i.
>>Maybe we should say several distributions have the shells have that as
>>an alias.  I don't like it either.
> 
> 
> Which shells in which default distribution packages?
> 
> It's easily remedied.  I can't imagine why any experienced unix user would
> promote such a thing.

Very true.  Redhat/bash for one.  IIRC, SuSE as well.  I think most 
experienced ones don't as well they should.

anyway, I guess we should get back to promoting a pro-orgy, homosexual, 
communist, godless society.