[PLUG-TALK] Personal attacks

[anonymous]

On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 23:09, Mark wrote:
> Jeme A Brelin wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Mark wrote:
>  
> Well, technically you're correct the systems don't alias rm to rm -i.
> Maybe we should say several distributions have the shells have that as
> an alias.  I don't like it either.
>  
>  
> Which shells in which default distribution packages?
>  
> It's easily remedied.  I can't imagine why any experienced unix user would
> promote such a thing.
> 
> Very true.  Redhat/bash for one.  IIRC, SuSE as well.  I think most 
> experienced ones don't as well they should.
> 
> anyway, I guess we should get back to promoting a pro-orgy, homosexual, 
> communist, godless society.

There's no we.  Noone can create a godless society, this is a fallacy.
God is beyond anything humans can  either create or deny existence.  
The worst anyone can do is promote a society that ignores God, no more.