[PLUG-TALK] More Guns
Brian Beattie
beattie at beattie-home.net
Thu Jul 1 00:06:57 UTC 2004
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 19:19, AthlonRob wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 16:01 -0700, Jeme A Brelin wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, AthlonRob wrote:
> > > OJ wouldn't have known if she would have gotten it to protect herself
> > > from him - I don't think she'd have let him know. :-)
> >
> > Isn't that directly counter to the "deterrent effect" of packing a gun?
> >
> > Again, you seem to be encouraging greater harm by supporting the idea (and
> > getting some glee from it, if I interpret the colon-dash-parens correctly)
> > that she should have waited to be attacked and then done some killing.
>
> There are two ways to look at this... either let him know you have a
> gun, so he knows to bring a bigger gun... or don't let him know you have
> a gun and let it be a surprise (and a deterrent at the incident itself)
> for him.
>
> Not letting him know seems to be working more in our favor here...
> walking around telling everybody you have a gun isn't going to lead to
> more peace most of the time. Silently carrying one won't have an impact
> on the peace until peace is already broken.
>
> Sounds like a win-win situation to me.
So now he knows she has a gun, so next time he brings a bigger gun, or
is a dead body win-win, no I don't think firearms get anybody any where
in this.
--
Brian Beattie LFS12947 | "Honor isn't about making the right choices.
beattie at beattie-home.net | It's about dealing with the consequences."
www.beattie-home.net | -- Midori Koto
More information about the PLUG-talk
mailing list