[PLUG-TALK] Bike helmets, science, and anger

Russell Johnson russ at dimstar.net
Wed Jan 27 01:45:42 UTC 2016


Do those cyclists not get injured because they have helmets on? 

I’d like to see stats from the 1970’s where almost no one on two wheels (motorized or otherwise) wore a helmet. 

-Russ

> On Jan 25, 2016, at 12:36, Paul Heinlein <heinlein at madboa.com> wrote:
> 
> Risk of head injury per million hours travelled:
> 
> Motorcyclist  -  7.66
> Pedestrian  -  0.80
> Motor vehicle occupant  -  0.46
> Cyclist  -  0.41
> 
> The science here says that, on a per-hour-travelled basis, helmets would actually be more effective at preventing injuries on pedestrians and motorists than bicyclists.
> 
> Yet some folks get all hot and bothered by cyclists without helmets. Why is that?
> 
> http://www.howiechong.com/journal/2014/2/bike-helmets
> 
> -- 
> Paul Heinlein
> heinlein at madboa.com
> 45°38' N, 122°6' W_______________________________________________
> PLUG-talk mailing list
> PLUG-talk at lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-talk




More information about the PLUG-talk mailing list