[PLUG] OT - Hot Geek Girls
Jeff Schwaber
freyley at gmx.net
Wed Aug 27 16:02:02 UTC 2003
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 14:43, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> > Death is the best form of avoiding procreation. Well, death by flambe,
> > as that also sterilizes you and prevents your sperm or eggs from being
> > used after your death.
> >
> > Jeff
>
> God should kill us? That's a wish I won't echo.
That is not at all what I said. You were speaking that because God could
foil counter measures (birth control and whatnot), abstinence was the
only fully successful method.
But clearly if there is an all powerful God, abstinence is not a fully
succesful method, and even if there isn't, human virtue is too frail to
be fully successful for more than, you know, a few tenths of a
thousandth of one percent of the population.
Now, if you want a method of birth control which is fully successful
whether or not there is an all powerful God, you are speaking of the
method known as death. By flambe.
> I made a proprosition, the logic works if you accept self preservation,
> I figure most people tend towards this. The logic is fine for
> reasonable people. As far as religiosity, self preservation is a
> secular pillar of civilized societies. Without self preservation
> societies crumble, look at the Roman Empire if you think I'm nuts.
Actually, you made a bunch of pompous, religious statements.
And I made a response which is truly logical: dead people, especially
those who have died by fire, _cannot_ procreate. Do I suggest that we do
such? No. I thought we were talking about individual choices, so I at
most I was suggesting that if an individual wanted to make sure he or
she never procreated, his/her best bet would be to immolate themselves.
And these days, there being plenty of things to protest, you can get two
benefits for the price of one!
Jeff
More information about the PLUG
mailing list